jojo (Visitor)
Senior Boarder
Posts: 42
|
|
128k mp3 vs. 32k aac+ 3 Years, 11 Months ago
|
|
|
I prefer using the 32Kaac+, for me its quiet stable compared to 128kmp3, i'm no longer experiencing the sudden halt of broadcast and the sound quality is just the same with mp3.
Long live Soft 'N'Easy!!! you really cares for your listeners. 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
music washes away from the soul, the dust of everyday lives.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re: 128k mp3 vs. 32k aac+ 3 Years, 11 Months ago
|
|
|
I prefer using the 32Kaac+, for me its quiet stable compared to 128kmp3, i'm no longer experiencing the sudden halt of broadcast and the sound quality is just the same with mp3.
Long live Soft 'N'Easy!!! you really cares for your listeners. 8)
Yes, one does need a very good connection for 128k. When AAC+ become more widely adopted I'll likely kill the 128k stream and use 64k AAC+ for my "high" bit rate. We'll see what happens as time goes on...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
jojo (Visitor)
Senior Boarder
Posts: 42
|
|
Re: 128k mp3 vs. 32k aac+ 3 Years, 11 Months ago
|
|
|
8) i just notice too that with all net radio available right now, no one can match the clarity of Soft'N'Easy's broadcast...even to stations who offer high bitrate aac+, and of course the music here..no kidding, its cool all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
music washes away from the soul, the dust of everyday lives.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re: 128k mp3 vs. 32k aac+ 3 Years, 11 Months ago
|
|
|
8) i just notice too that with all net radio available right now, no one can match the clarity of Soft'N'Easy's broadcast...even to stations who offer high bitrate aac+, and of course the music here..no kidding, its cool all the time.
Thanks! The key is clean source material. ALL my source files are uncompressed WAV from TM Century's GoldWAV library from which the files for playback originate. Playback files are either 192k mp3 or OGG files at quality setting 8. I may soon just use the uncompressed WAV files for the cleanest sound possible. I also use a processor that conditions the audio for the encoder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re: 128k mp3 vs. 32k aac+ 3 Years, 10 Months ago
|
|
|
so dave, does that mean u have a computer like ours? (Exsample) mine is a hp windows xp pro with AMD 64 1.49 gig memory, 2 120 gig hard drives soundbaster 5.1 live digital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The music we liston to,Is part of us every day
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re: 128k mp3 vs. 32k aac+ 3 Years, 10 Months ago
|
|
|
so dave, does that mean u have a computer like ours? (Exsample) mine is a hp windows xp pro with AMD 64 1.49 gig memory, 2 120 gig hard drives soundbaster 5.1 live digital
Sure, just a plain ol' off-the-shelf Dell Dimension 2300... 1ghz processor 80Gb drive, 512Mb memory. Nothing special.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
Favoured: 0
